Horty Springer 4614 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh Pa 15213, 1-800-245-1205
Home Page Navigation Legal Services Navigation Seminars Navigation Publications Navigation Audio Conferences Navigation Health Law Library Navigation Contact Navigation  

 

Audio Conferences

   
Audio CDs/MP3s
 
 
 
 

Deferred Compensation for ER Call
Audio Conference
Recorded May 25, 2006

Faculty: Dan Mulholland & Max Worth Consulting Group, LLC principals, Max Hockenberry and Steve Worthy

Emergency room call coverage is one of the most perplexing problems facing hospitals. Complicated EMTALA rules, increased malpractice exposure, shortages of specialists and competition from physician-owned entities have forced many hospitals into a corner. They are now paying or considering paying for what used to be a voluntarily-assumed responsibility of medical staff appointment.

Paying for call coverage is obviously not an ideal solution. If one specialty is paid today, nine others will be at the CEO's door tomorrow looking for their money. Payment methodologies are often very complicated, and can lead to billing problems for both the hospital and the doctor. Once payment for ER call begins, requests for payment in the future will only go up, not down. In the end, the hospital can find itself being sucked into a financial black hole from which there is no escape.

It obviously is better not having to pay for call. But, if you are going to pay for call, it pays to do it the right way. Recently, a few hospitals have been considering a novel concept - paying for ER call coverage through a deferred compensation program.

Similar to nonqualified supplemental retirement programs for health care executives, this concept uses the tax deferral provisions of Section 457(f) of the Tax Code to pay doctors later for ER call coverage today. Money is credited to the doctor's account as services are provided and kept in a "Rabbi trust." The doctor can direct the investment of the money in his or her account, which builds up tax-free until a vesting date five or ten years following the year in which call coverage is provided. At that time, the money is distributed to the doctor and subject to tax, but with the advantage of tax-deferred accumulation.

Like all deferred compensation programs, there must be a "substantial risk of forfeiture" in order to take advantage of the deferred taxation feature of Section 457(f). In this plan, the doctor can forfeit the amount in his or her account by failing to take call in the future, dropping out of Medicare or Medicaid, refusing to treat charity patients or investing in a competing facility. Thus, what otherwise was an onerous responsibility for the doctor and potential financial disaster for the hospital now becomes a way to align the incentives of both parties.

Max Worth Consulting Group, LLC principals, Max Hockenberry and Steve Worthy, along with HortySpringer partner Dan Mulholland, discuss the following topics regarding deferred compensation for ER call:

• Traditional ER call payment methods
• Why they don't work well
• Basic principles of deferred compensation
• Applying deferred compensation to ER call
• Possible events of forfeiture
• Vesting options
• Who gets paid?
• How much can you pay?
• Structuring the transaction
• Personal services agreement
• Deferred compensation plan
• Rabbi trust
• Using company-owned life insurance ("COLI") to reduce the hospital's financial exposure
• How to present the program to your medical staff.



Audio CD: $225

ORDER NOW


Questions? Contact us via E-mail or call 1-800-245-1205