A few weeks ago, an anesthesiologist resigned from our medical staff to take an opportunity out of state. Recently, one of the anesthesiologist’s cases was flagged by a peer review specialist who sent me an email asking whether we should continue with our standard peer review process. Do you have any guidance?
OUR ANSWER FROM HORTYSPRINGER ATTORNEY JOHN WIECZOREK:
This situation is more common than you’d think, but always tricky. Because the anesthesiologist is no longer a member of your medical staff, we would advise that peer review of that anesthesiologist’s medical services provided at your hospital should be discontinued. The purpose of peer reviewing a specific physician is to ensure and improve quality; this purpose can no longer be effectuated if the anesthesiologist has left the medical staff. Among other things, many of the tools that could be used to improve care would no longer be available (such as asking the questions about the case, having the anesthesiologist complete additional training, or monitoring a few of the anesthesiologist’s cases at the hospital).
Also, depending on state law, a malpractice attorney may argue that the peer review privilege no longer applies to reviews conducted after the anesthesiologist has left the medical staff. Finally, if the anesthesiologist turns around and sues the hospital for whatever reason, continuing peer review of the anesthesiologist after their departure may give an eager plaintiff’s attorney something to hang onto (e.g., allegations that the purpose of the review is to harm the physician).
This does not mean the case should completely fall out of review; system-issues that were identified outside of the care being provided by the anesthesiologist are still relevant and should be addressed. We would just advise that any issues related to the anesthesiologist’s practice at the hospital be put aside.