As we can see from The Joint Commission at Work snippet, it looks like The Joint Commission expanded the appointment term for practitioners to three years from two years. What should we consider if we are interested in moving to three-year appointment terms?
OUR ANSWER FROM HORTYSPRINGER ATTORNEY CHARLES CHULACK:
Per the November 4, 2022 FAQ “How are reappointment/re-privileging dates determined?” The Joint Commission instructed that “[r]eappointment/re-privileging is due no later than three years from the same date from the previous appointment or reappointment, or for a period required by law or regulation if shorter” (emphasis added). The FAQ notes that “[a]dditional information will be published in the December 2022 Perspectives Newsletter regarding a change to the reprivileging/reappointment time frame.” Thus, it is not clear if this rule has been finalized, especially since the standards available continue to require a two-year appointment period. Nonetheless, before you move in the direction of allowing a longer appointment term, you should confirm that your state hospital licensing regulations permit a three-year term. For example, both Idaho and North Carolina regulations require two-year appointment terms. As the quoted language from the FAQ above states, the appointment term may be shorter than three years “if required by law or regulation.” In other words, state hospital law or regulation will control so you want to be sure to check that first. Also, when The Joint Commission implemented the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (“OPPE”) standard, they considered doing away with the reappointment process. The Joint Commission’s rationale was that a well‑functioning OPPE process, which requires “ongoing” monitoring of clinical care and other factors, would render reappointment unnecessary. The Joint Commission never did away with the reappointment process. However, you should evaluate whether you have a well-functioning OPPE process that catches issues and trends quickly, allowing you to act, intervene, and protect patients. If not, it may be wise to maintain the shorter reappointment term of two years to take a closer look at practitioners’ clinical practice and professionalism at the Hospital.
Stay tuned – Horty, Springer & Mattern plans to do a podcast on the issue and provide additional information.